No edit summary |
Fleur758@legacy41782218 (talk | contribs) (so long, and thanks for all the fish) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
What is the purpose of spreading related information? [[Critical Hit]] and this guide discuss pretty the same topic, dont they? Do I care too little about the forum to understand? =Fleur (15.1.) |
What is the purpose of spreading related information? [[Critical Hit]] and this guide discuss pretty the same topic, dont they? Do I care too little about the forum to understand? =Fleur (15.1.) |
||
:This guide contains a lot of good information, but is mostly the author's opinion, such as offensive and defensive strategies. I would like to keep the page [[Critical Hit]] limited to only facts about how it works in the game. I intend on creating a new namespace of "Guide:". These will be pages that contain not only facts but also opinions of the author like this guide does. --[[User:Seth|Seth]] 16:00, 15 January 2013 (CST) |
:This guide contains a lot of good information, but is mostly the author's opinion, such as offensive and defensive strategies. I would like to keep the page [[Critical Hit]] limited to only facts about how it works in the game. I intend on creating a new namespace of "Guide:". These will be pages that contain not only facts but also opinions of the author like this guide does. --[[User:Seth|Seth]] 16:00, 15 January 2013 (CST) |
||
| + | ::That guide has many precious facts on crits, agreed, totally. And that's exactly y I dont c, that they don't fit into the article and need a seperate guide. Even fear u'r plan of a seperate namespace for further guides: if a topic is so complex and has so many facts about it, that one's lost without a guide, I'd c the need, but would still expect to find the main facts in its article. Having loads of stub articles and valuable info spread on guides, is precisely the environment that made me lost between the given info here, when I stumbled over this wiki. If it's an opinion or a thought, there's cquote, like used in [[Gauss Rifle]], imho. - The changes and work on the guides last weeks made me pretty insecure what this is going to be. Whilst trying to fill articles with content, someone drops in a guide about the stuff. - With the prospect of guides being the main lead here, I'm out; I'll occasionally search forum for them. =Fleur, 16.1.13 8:19 cet |
||
Revision as of 07:30, 16 January 2013
What is the purpose of spreading related information? Critical Hit and this guide discuss pretty the same topic, dont they? Do I care too little about the forum to understand? =Fleur (15.1.)
- This guide contains a lot of good information, but is mostly the author's opinion, such as offensive and defensive strategies. I would like to keep the page Critical Hit limited to only facts about how it works in the game. I intend on creating a new namespace of "Guide:". These will be pages that contain not only facts but also opinions of the author like this guide does. --Seth 16:00, 15 January 2013 (CST)
- That guide has many precious facts on crits, agreed, totally. And that's exactly y I dont c, that they don't fit into the article and need a seperate guide. Even fear u'r plan of a seperate namespace for further guides: if a topic is so complex and has so many facts about it, that one's lost without a guide, I'd c the need, but would still expect to find the main facts in its article. Having loads of stub articles and valuable info spread on guides, is precisely the environment that made me lost between the given info here, when I stumbled over this wiki. If it's an opinion or a thought, there's cquote, like used in Gauss Rifle, imho. - The changes and work on the guides last weeks made me pretty insecure what this is going to be. Whilst trying to fill articles with content, someone drops in a guide about the stuff. - With the prospect of guides being the main lead here, I'm out; I'll occasionally search forum for them. =Fleur, 16.1.13 8:19 cet