Template talk:Mech Specs

Well this looks interesting!--Seth 09:50, 21 January 2013 (CST)
 * sandbox: Annihilator
 * Would like to have 'Speed' without unit, makes for a shorter list, but #-n is not working
 * The km/h is added through the template, so it can be removed easily if you want that property to have a type of number
 * 'Jump Jets' and 'ECM' showed up as 'No', if not excistent. For better readability in lists I'd suggest '-' instead of no ... I exchanged the default for them in template:mech model ... now only those mechs have the property, that actually have jj/ecm ... is that wanted? Result: now I can't search the property for having 'no' ... is that needed?
 * I would suggest something like . I can add somewhere in the template  as a hidden property so that 'Mechs with no jump jets installed will show as having 0 jump jet slots. That way, only the pages for 'Mechs with jump jets will need to be updated.
 * Property 'Jump Jets' is text *sigh* ... according to armor, I'd somehow wish they'd be a number and could have a 'Jets max.'?==Fleur
 * Edit Property:Jump Jets to have a type of number. But the 'Mech pages will all need to have the yes changed to numbers or an error will be displayed.

Table Width The table width needs to kept within 750ish pixels or the whole site will be too wide for some screens. The reason I have the hardpoints and chassis attributes on separate tables is because it was stretch the site too wide. In total, the content width should be able to shrink down to 1000px without having to scroll side to side.


 * You are blowing my mind with this. I haven't tried my hand at using the template format yet, but it looks like it could consolidate the specs and hardpoints all into one area rather than the two that it's spread out among currently.--Seth (talk) 04:53, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Adjusted some css so that the first tab could be displayed at 750px wide instead of squishing it into 600px. It gives the rows rooms to just use 1 line per 'Mech which cuts down on how tall it could end up being after a couple of years.--Seth (talk) 05:28, 30 January 2013 (UTC)